Sony Xperia 1 III versus Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra: for persons who need everything

The Sony Xperia 1 III denotes Sony's most recent exertion to give us a definitive devotee's cell phone. However, in case there's one gadget that hinders its, it must be the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra. 

It's an entrancing go head to head. Both of these telephones are huge, amazing, and full to the edge of very good quality parts and eye catching highlights. Both expense a terrible part of cash, as well. 

But then the marks of differentiation run far and profound. Neither of these telephones is an instance of plan by-board of trustees, with both addressing tough individual dreams of what a top cell phone ought to be from producers with differed interests. 

So which superphone would we purchase in case we were smacking our own money down on the counter? 

Sony Xperia 1 III versus Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra cost and accessibility 

The Sony Xperia 1 III is strolling a somewhat roundabout way to advertise. Having been uncovered on April 14, 2021, it's not set to be delivered until August 19 in the US and UK markets. Its cost is set at a powerful $1,299.99/£1,199 (generally AU$1,800) for 256GB of capacity and 12GB of RAM. 

There's likewise a 512GB limit model out there, yet it apparently will not be going to the US or the UK. While we're regarding the matter, the absence of Australian estimating here mirrors the way that Sony doesn't sell its telephones in all key business sectors like. 

The Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra pulled the contrary stunt to its adversary, arrival sooner than anticipated on January 29, 2021 in every key market. Costs for Samsung's present lead start at $1,199/£1,149/AU$1,849 for 128GB of capacity, while the 256GB model expenses $1,249.99/£1,199/AU$1,949. 

The top 512GB model, which additionally accompanies 16GB of RAM as opposed to 12GB, will hamper you $1,329.99/AU$2,149. Samsung doesn't offer the last top model in the US market.'' 

In the event that we're thinking about the like-for-like 256GB/12GB RAM model, these two telephones are generally something very similar (rather excessive cost. 

Design 

We love the way both of these telephones look and believe, and we additionally love the way that they're totally not quite the same as each other. 

Sony, specifically, has since quite a while ago opposed the predominant breezes of cell phone plan. Not for Sony are the bended showcases and obtrusive screen indents of the rest. 

The Sony Xperia 1 III has a basic rectangular profile, level edges, and a dead-level showcase. And keeping in mind that that show's advantages and disadvantages can be discussed (and will be in the following segment), there's no rejecting that its notchless methodology is best on the off chance that you devour a great deal of media. 

This implies that the Xperia 1 III has somewhat of a brow, however it's a long way from immense, and it's decent out by an indistinguishably proportioned jawline. This likewise empowers the arrangement of front-terminating sound system speakers, while the Samsung has one that is descending terminating. Include a 3.5mm earphone jack, and the Sony has the more complete sound appearance of the two. 

We likewise endorse Sony's choice to jettison sparkle and embrace an off-white glass finish to the back board. In that manner, at any rate, these two telephones are in total agreement, as the Galaxy S21 Ultra likewise glances incredible in secretive matte dark. 

There's somewhat of a tangle of catches on the right-hand edge of the Xperia, with committed screen and Google Assistant catches joining an augmented force button and a volume rocker. Returning to that force button, it contains a rapid unique mark sensor when most leader rivals (Samsung included) go the in-show course. Samsung's ultrasonic framework is significantly better over earlier years however, so it truly boils down to individual inclination. 

The Sony is an exceptionally tall telephone as well, kindness of a strange 21:9 screen angle proportion and those all-encompassing top and base bezels. It measures 165 x 71mm, which implies that it's actually pretty much as tall as the 165.1 x 75.6mm Galaxy S21 Ultra, however significantly smaller. 

Sony's telephone is somewhat more slender than Samsung's too at 8.2mm versus 8.9mm. It's likewise lighter by a long shot at 186g, or a gram more for the US mmWave variation. The Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra is a generally heavy monster at 228g. 

Display

The Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra is the greater gadget, then, at that point, however it wears its size well. It utilizes its bends to mellow its mass, and it's a really wonderful piece of unit from any point. Specifically, the telephone's dipping camera module configuration makes an element out of a strategic issue. 

The Samsung telephone is a little harder in certain manners as well. While the Sony just has super-extreme Gorilla Glass Victus on the facade of the gadget, and more fragile Gorilla Glass 6 to the back, the Galaxy S21 Ultra has Victus front and back. 

Then again, Sony's telephone has a more extensive IP65/IP68 residue and water opposition rating contrasted with the IP68-affirmed Samsung. This implies that the Xperia 1 III can withstand planes of water just as full submersion. 

There's a horrendous part to unload with these two OLED shows. By and by, Samsung and Sony have decided to do things extremely any other way to each other. 

Samsung's methodology is the more clear and strong and, we'd adventure, the better of the two for a great many people. It's greater at 6.8-inches (6.5-crawls for the Sony), and it gets more splendid to the tune of 1500 nits. Sony hasn't provided figures for its own presentation, which addresses a dimmer board. 

The Sony Xperia 1 III hits back with a 4K goal, which adds up to 3840 x 1644 pixels. Samsung's greater presentation can 'just' hit QHD (3200 x 1440) by examination. 

In any case, it's very interesting to recognize the distinction in goal here - absolutely not in a similar way that you can from FHD to QHD. Furthermore, in addition, the Galaxy S21 Ultra executes QHD without compromise. 

While the Sony runs flawlessly at 4K, it can't do as such while keeping up with its 120Hz invigorate rate. At whatever point 4K is utilized, the screen drops to 60Hz. The Galaxy S21 Ultra, in the interim, can keep up with QHD and 120Hz all the while. 

As we've effectively referenced, the Sony has a super-wide 21:9 perspective proportion. The Samsung goes with 20:9, as most different telephones. Along with the Xperia 1 III's absence of a score, it makes Sony's telephone a superior gadget for watching local widescreen film content on, just as loaning certain games an extra artistic edge. 

For regular use, be that as it may, we'd likely hand the Galaxy S21 Ultra the triumph. It's just better enhanced and more reliable with its yield on an everyday and undertaking by-task premise. 

Camera 

Would it shock you to discover that Samsung and Sony have totally different thoughts regarding what comprises a premium cell phone camera experience? Ideally not, in case you've been focusing. 

Sony's methodology is about speed and control. For speed, the Xperia 1 III utilizes a moderately low pixel tally (it's a 12MP primary sensor) and mastery from its imposing Alpha camera office to make the quickest, most developed double pixel self-adjust framework accessible on any cell phone. It'll roll out shots like an automatic rifle, and will lock onto the eyes of a hyperactive pup or youngster without issue. 

For control, Sony gives you the most involved and favorable to even out camera application we've seen outside of outsider contributions. While it defaults to a Basic simple to use mode, you're emphatically urged to go active with center, ISO, screen speed, and other such settings. You additionally get that devoted two-stage shade button, which truly raises the experience. 

There's additionally another and creative double focal point fax camera, which will flick between a f/2.3 3x and a f/2.8 4.4x focal point at the press of a catch. Like we said, speed and control. 

For Samsung, everything's tied in with making every photograph you take with the Galaxy S21 Ultra the sort of splendid, dynamic, clear shot you'll need to impart to other people - regardless of how testing the lighting or distant the subject. Keeping that in mind, it gives you an immense 1/1.33" 108MP wide sensor, which utilizes a 9-in–1 pixel binning strategy to create fresh, clear, especially uncovered shots in splendid or dull conditions. 

Maybe than two focal points, Samsung gives both of you separate fax cameras - one a 10MP f/2.4 3x and one a 10MP f/4.9 10x. They'll consolidate with that 108MP principle sensor to make 100x half and half zoom shots, however the sign of its actual viability is the potential for nice 20x shots. 

The two telephones pack likewise estimated 12MP super wide sensors with f/2.2 openings. 

On the video front, the two telephones have their qualities. Just the Galaxy S21 Ultra can oversee 8K film at 30fps, while just the Xperia 1 III can hit 4K at 120fps. The last is conceivably more helpful, opening up the chance of perfectly fresh slo-mo film. 

We'd give Samsung the success for its 40MP front camera, which yields more honed and preferred adjusted selfies over the Sony's 8MP same. 

So which camera framework is better generally? For general fire-and-neglect point and shooting, the Samsung wins out. It just works harder and more intelligent to create extraordinary looking shots than the Sony, which expects you to painstakingly consider your shot sythesis in the event that you truly need to receive the absolute best in return. 

Some will favor Sony's more nonpartisan and normal shading science to Samsung's every so often bombastic hyper-reality. Be that as it may, a great many people need to post to Instagram with their telephones, not enter a photography rivalry.

Specs and execution 

The one place of comparability here is the manner by which these two telephones are controlled. Or if nothing else, that is the situation in case you're situated in the US or China. 

In those nations, the two telephones will give you a Snapdragon 888 CPU and 12GB of RAM. Outside of those nations, just Sony sticks with that spec. The Galaxy S21 Ultra trades out the Qualcomm chip for Samsung's own Exynos 2100. 

This point alone hands the success to the Sony - yet exclusively by a small portion. Samsung's most recent chip has shut the hole on its Qualcomm comparable by some edge, yet it's as yet not exactly as quick. 

Both the CPU and GPU-based benchmark tests will in general support the Sony Xperia 1 III. Once more, however, the hole truly isn't enormous. At the point when it boils down to very good quality 3D games like Genshin Impact and CoD Mobile, you're probably not going to get on the distinction. 

As far as capacity alternatives, the two telephones exist in both 256GB and 512GB cycles, contingent upon your area. In any case, just the Samsung likewise offers a lower 128GB alternative. Then again, the Xperia 1 III gives you a microSDXC space for extension purposes, which is conceivably a lot greater arrangement. 

As with such a large amount this go head to head, the topic of who offers the best programming is probably going to separate individuals. Sony goes with a very perfect interpretation of Android that holds a lot of Google's unique design. It adds a small bunch of Sony applications and a slick split-screen work for gaining by that long presentation, yet in any case it's a significant fair complexion. 

Samsung, paradoxically, is somewhat more active with its product changes. One UI isn't as in-your-face as it used to be, however there are still heaps of customization choices, outsider applications, adjusted menus, and patched up UI components in plain view. 

It's worth focusing on that the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra adds upholds for Samsung's S Pen pointer. It's not also incorporated as the Note series - there are no Bluetooth easy routes for instance - yet it's there if need to change to a note-taking apparatus anytime. 

Battery life 

The principle justification the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra being such a great deal greater than the Sony Xperia 1 III is that it has a lot greater battery. We're talking 5000 mAh for the Samsung and 4500 mAh for the Sony. 

While the Xperia 1 III games that 4K showcase, however, it doesn't run that at the same time with a 120Hz revive rate. The Galaxy S21 Ultra, then again, yields at QHD and 120Hz at the same time. Include the way that it's greater and more splendid, and it could simply be the more force hungry part when running level out. 

Strangely, the Sony defaults to 4K/60fps, while the Samsung defaults to FHD/120fps. 

The two telephones will get you through an entire day of use with all settings maximized, however just barely. We tracked down that the Xperia 1 III would will in general have around 10% left toward the finish of a difficult day of moderate use. 

The Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra would easily traverse an entire day in FHD/120Hz conditions, yet would will in general make us sweat when set to QHD/120Hz. 

One specific imprint in the Sony's approval is that it packages the Xperia 1 III with a 30W charger. Samsung just backings 25W charging, and it doesn't give you that power block in the case. 

The two telephones will uphold remote and opposite charging. 

Takeaway 

You truly must have a long hard think before you part with $1,300/£1,200/AU$1,800 for a cell phone. So while you're making that estimation, ensure you factor in decisively what you need from your ideal cell phone. 

Do you need an overall champ with a gigantic, super-splendid showcase? Do you need your camera to take easily brilliant, sharp shots, and with uncanny zoom abilities? The Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra might want to say hello. 

Or then again would you say you are somebody who likes to watch motion pictures in a hurry in as near realistic devotion as could be expected? Do you demand cautiously forming your portable photographs, aside from when the circumstance requests the quickest and most dependable self-adjust conceivable? Kid, does the Xperia 1 III have a proposal for you. 

As an overall bundle, the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra has the edge here. It's somewhat more cleaned and refined, with more extensive allure and a marginally seriously welcoming set-up. These are two splendid fan telephones, yet Samsung keeps the entryway slightly more open for every other person.

Galaxy Note 7 Suspected Rare Back Case Exploded

 In the midst of the frenzy of the world's anticipation of the Samsung Galaxy Note 9, now rumors that the product "predecessor", Galaxy Note 7 allegedly back in trouble with the battery.

Galaxy Note 7 itself was brought to market and became one of Samsung's best-selling mobile phone problems on the battery in 2016.

Because of the better problem, the smartphone has even been withdrawn. The South Korean manufacturer was willing to issue a new unit that should be safe for use by customers.

But according to Phone Arena, edition of Thursday, July 26, 2018, one of these devices is problematic when the owner goes aboard a commercial passenger plane.

The owner of the Galaxy Note 7 drops it at the bottom of the plane and the handset immediately burns and makes a hole in the carpet of the aircraft.

Given the history, some owners are very fond of this device. They reject Samsung's call to return devices or exchange them with others.

Since January 2017, 96% more than all Galaxy Note 7 devices have been restored to Samsung owners. The manufacturer has also sent an update that prevents the phone from being charged.

But not all Galaxy Note 7 bought by consumers can enter the plane. Some airlines continue to send a sign at the airport stating that nobody can board if they carry the Samsung Galaxy Note 7.

Sammy's (Samsung nickname) support page uploaded on April 17, 2018, asked the consumer of Galaxy Note 7 to transfer his unit to Samsung, where the handset records "pose a security risk". And the risk is not only for the owner of the phone, but also for the people around him.

By reporting the Reddit page, says Phone Arena, there are owners of Galaxy Note 7 who discusses that they still use the phone, including an owner who placed a photo of the battery in his device that started to swell.

The XDA developer page contains instructions for restoring the Galaxy Note 7 that is "dead" to be back again.

If you like the Galaxy Note 7, you can always search for the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition last year. Made from the stored parts of the unreliable device Galaxy Note 7.

The flagship phone has a 3200 mAh battery or a smaller capacity than the 3,500 mAh that was used to turn the Galaxy Note 7 on.

The device also replaces Snapdragon 820 SoC that is used Galaxy Note 7 with Snapdragon 821 chipset.

What about the Galaxy Note 7 in Indonesia? There is no official information from Samsung Indonesia about this problem.

Samsung phones are sending pictures to contacts without users knowing

SAMSUNG smartphones are sending users' pictures to their contacts without their permission, according to complaints by a number of people posted online.

This problem seems to affect Galaxy S9 and Galaxy Note 8 users.

One user at Reddit said that the entire mobile photo library is not recorded in his messaging app. He found that it happened through his T-Mobile log.

Users report that it is a Samsung Messages issue which is the default messaging app of a Korean company device.

One of the Samsung community forums says that messaging apps become "very buggy" after T-Mobile is updated for rich communication messaging services (RCS).

This new standard facilitates the transmission of video and other media with message protocols between various operators. We aim to replace traditional SMS messages.

"Samsung has reviewed this matter thoroughly these past few days; however, there were no hardware or software issues found to be relevant to this particular case. While there have been no known similar customer reports globally, we will continue to investigate this issue further," a spokesperson told CNBC by email on Tuesday.

Later, Samsung updated a statement saying it was not a problem with software or hardware.

Samsung review this issue as completely as possible. A spokeswoman told CNBC via email on Tuesday.

T-Mobile can not immediately comment. However, the cellular network told other media, "This is not T-Mobile's problem."

A collapsible "Project V" phone canceled by Samsung a few years ago appears in reverse photos

Recently, the ZTE Foldable Axon M caused a slight crash when it was released as a single product, not a 5.2-inch 1080p display.

It was a bold move, but he certainly did not sell well. Samsung knew the same idea from 2015 to 2016, and it seems that he finally decided to end the project. However, it shows whether some leaked images called "Project V" have recently surfaced.

The model number of the phone is SM-G929F. For reference, the edge of the Galaxy S6 and Galaxy S7 were respectively SM-G925x and SM-G930x and were developed around 2015-2016.

This is supported by the previous icon in the Play Store and on Wednesday 7 January on the home screen widget (which means, if you are confident, this year should be 2015).

Like the Axon M, the base of the Project V phone is thicker and has the thinnest side folding screen. The overall appearance of the Galaxy S6 is reminiscent of the Galaxy S6 and features the same basic design as the bottom port.

Capacitive springs and back buttons are reminiscent of Samsung for years. A single camera and flash are typical features of this foldable phone.

If you can not talk on the old side of the phone, the tweets include some "CANCEL" that you can rest assured.

But for a moment, we heard rumors about Samsung's new collapsible phone. Maybe the Korean technology giants will soon be ready to launch public phone calls to the public.

Samsung is working on three models of the Galaxy S10, one of which has a system with three cameras?

NEXT year will be the ten-year jubilee of the Galaxy S-series, and Samsung is expected to do everything it can to celebrate the milestone.

The latest ETNews report says that we can look at three models of the Galaxy S10.

According to ETNews, Samsung is working on three models of Galaxy S10 with the following code names: Beyond 0, Beyond 1 and Beyond 2.

Beyond 0 is positioned as an entry-level model with a 5.8-inch flat screen, while the Beyond 1 has a curved screen of the same size.

Beyond 2 is the successor of the Galaxy S9 + and has a 6.2-inch curved screen with a system with three cameras.

Since Huawei launched the first configuration with three cameras, developed by Leica on the P20 Pro, there were rumors that Apple would do the same and that the iPhone with a camera with three lenses next year.

If Samsung does not want to be seen by delayed competitors, it is likely that the company will equip the Galaxy S10 with a three camera system to stay relevant.

According to reports, the Galaxy S10 will be delivered with a fingerprint sensor on the screen and a 3D face scanning module, two highly commented functions already present in competing flagship telephones.

Samsung owes Apple $ 1 billion - or maybe just $ 28 million. Okay, jury, what's it gonna be?

A lawsuit between Apple and Samsung, two of the region's largest technology companies, may seem like a lawsuit between two of the region's biggest auto companies.

On Friday, an eight-person jury began its deliberations at the US court in San Jose, in the center of Silicon Valley, and 10 kilometers from Apple's headquarters. They were able to make a statement as soon as possible about how much money Samsung owes Apple for violating three of its rival design patents and two utility patents when it sold millions of sixteen obsolete phone models in 2010 and 2011..

Where do the cars come in? To help jurors share their thoughts about the complexity of the problem, each party sends them to simpler analogies with cars.

The jury's decision will help determine if design patents become stronger - and probably also in numbers - if companies try to take advantage of their ideas in style and decoration. Such an increase could help the forces of technology remain strong. And more specifically, for Samsung, it will determine whether the company will pay the fine of $ 28 million that it considers only for infringement of the design patent or $ 1.07 billion that Apple wants.

So it's a big problem. Let's look at some details of what happened since the beginning of this case in 2011, what happened this week and what happens next.

We started with the car thing.

### Cars and Production Items

The focus of the case is how to determine which fines Samsung should pay. The status of design patents means that the South Korean electronics giant should miss out on the sale of the "production article" that infringes Apple's patents. Samsung lost to Apple in 2012, or it raped, but it prevailed in the Supreme Court, which in 2016 found that this profit could come from a part of a product, not the entire product.

However, the way you determine exactly what this manufacturing artifact is is quite confusing. District Judge Lucy Koh, who is in charge of the four trials in the Northern District of California, has adopted a four-factor heavy test to evaluate the article and therefore whether Samsung should pay its fine on full phones. or just a few components.

Samsung and Apple have corrected the situation in different car analogies. In a previous test, a Samsung expert stated that a full product-based fine meant that a person who broke the patented design of a cup holder had to pay compensation based on the profit from the sale of the cup. the whole car.

Apple's lawyer, Bill Lee, said last Friday that it was ridiculous. "Samsung wants you to believe that Ford decided to break the shape of the [Volkswagen's] beetle ... the good element of production would have been the outside of the car," he said. Instead, the manufacturing element would be the entire car in this case, and the whole phone in the case of Samsung.

### Connect the dots
This leads us to another problem: what exactly is Apple's patent. One factor in the four-factor test is what is actually claimed in the patent, and Apple and Samsung have struggled with the problem. Design patents show what is projected on images, with solid lines to the covered area and dotted or dotted lines to areas that are not covered. The patents are very clear about this: "The dashed lines in the figures show parts of the electronic device that are not part of the claimed project."

A witness from Samsung, designer Sam Lucente, emphasized this point by showing two of Apple's design patents - the US patent D618677 (abbreviated as D'677), which has a black rectangular front with rounded corners for a device. U.S. Patent No. D593,087 (D'087), which discloses a similar rounded angle rectangular front face plus the surrounding machined edge to completely remove the dotted line material.

"First, I showed the complete design of the patent, so I wanted to make it clear to the jury that this is what was claimed," Lucente said.
As Apple wants to focus on the whole design of the phone, he argued that dashed lines are important.


"He acknowledged that it is important to have a context, he is committed has to erase ALL of this context," said Apple lawyer Joe Mueller, August Jüri in his final request. "He can not pay attention."

But Samsung's lawyer Bill Quinn replied in His Closing Argument, Exhibiting One's Apple patent design D789.926, which is not part of the lawsuit and since Apple has tried, Success Week, Worm to Avoid Jurors. The patent describes the cover design that our iPhones originated for the SIM. Almost all patents, including a small drawer, that appear at the end of the iPhone, are drawn in dotted lines.

"We're trying to make a good example of electric power, [Apple] gets all the benefits," says Quinn.

At Samsung you're right, said Sarah Burstein, a professor at the University of Oklahoma, what's the problem with the article in an interview.

"ONLY ONE party MUST claim" to marry "for a violation, THEN the universe of products potentially infringing AND MUCH BIGGER," said Burstein, who is NOT involved in the case. "If Apple Has Finished Prevailing Here, We Can See Myself, But Candidates Building SIMILAR Portfolios of Declarations Fragmented design fragments that would allow eels that are blended together and for the kind of Frankenclaim that Apple has continued to try to AFFIRM here."

### Cookies of 1 without a booth
After the discussion on Monday and the arguments of the opening on Tuesday, Apple has Samsung called the witnesses. Apple Executives Like Richard Howarth, Third Director of the Company's Design Team, and Greg Joswiak, Vice President of Products at Apple's Discussed Marketing has a design philosophy from Apple. ripped off the iPhone.

But spéciales bones design in exterior the supported Apple of the part to make a great burden arguing THAT ARE THE APPARELS "Unit" or monolithic phones, NAS Words make industrial designer Alan Ball. MAYBE MAJORLY HAVE THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE PROCESS HAS BEEN Susan Kare, a graphic designer who CREATED bones icons to make Macintosh Originals back home year 80 and who has testified that it has American patent D604,305 (of 305), which Color Grade describes An Icon, Applies -to a whole phone.

Looking at How Images of the First iPhone of 2007 Kare Said: "It Shines and You Puff Our Eyes Why and Tao of how much color attracts fast You with All How Much Ideas Do This Could Be Not Directly Relevant But The Apple Side Has Spent A Lot time design that really changed the world.

Refutation of Samsung
Samsung's witnesses have sought to demonstrate that counterfeit products are glass front panels, screens with goggles and screens.

THEY HAVE BEEN CAREFUL TO HIGHLIGHT A THOUSAND BACK COMPONENT COMPONENTS AND A SMOKE PHONE Samsung has show As One opened Whole factory for them repaired. The back of the four manufacturing factors is to become separate from the rest of the product.

Bones Phones IT HAS MANY ELEMENTS That Is Not Near Patented Back Projects, Says It Has Samsung Batteries, Video Cameras, 4G Radio Network Messages Text Software And MUCH more. In Journal Last Review, THESE range of Technologies That Is Distinct from Facing Back Phones and Networking Black Icons MUST be convincing to be, said Tom Engellenner, an Intellectual Property Lawyer doing Hamilton Law Firm, which is not affiliated. without trial.

"I was impressed with the testimony of ... Samsung Galaxy MUST have its smartphones Up to 10 Different Antennas - for various Telecommunication Operators, Radio, Bluetooth, GPS, etc.," Engellenner said. "I would be surprised Ue is has the Apple pit Able to convince Yuri of the time Second that had Right to all The profits of Samsung on Your phone How damages FOR patent infringement YOUR project focused ONLY on display form and bevelled edges of the iPhone."



### Jury time
The evidence and arguments ended Friday, so the case is now in the hands of eight jurors.

They are equipped with a set of 45-page instructions, a cart full of files filled with thousands of pages of evidence, a laptop to examine spreadsheets and a pile of archaic Android phones that they can try. (There are no games, however, they say the jury's instructions.)

The jurors should weigh the arguments and then make some accounts. The way they will come back when it's done is simple: a list of the offending phone models on one side of the page and the amount that Samsung owes to each on the other side.

Most of the damage will come from the three design patents. For both utility patents, Samsung has not challenged Apple's expert calculation of a $ 5.3 million damage payment - enough to buy a good home in Palo Alto, Calif., But a misery compared to the fine of several billion possible with the project. patent.

The lawyers say they will be ready in five minutes to hear the verdict of the jury. They do not have a deadline, but Koh said he would be surprised if the deliberations lasted more than a few days.

The case will likely be appealed, and in the end, it will likely end up in the hands of the US court, which will face the thorny question of the four-factor test for the article of manufacture, Burstein said. "So, really, we will all have to keep our breath," she said.

However, technology companies have learned a good lesson on patents.

"If Apple leaves with a billion dollars or half of that, I think the message has already been heard by companies," said Engellenner. "Design patents are not strange, but valuable weapons to protect well-designed products."

Apple: Find out what the tech giant holds as he prepares new iPhones and more.

"Hello, Humans": Google's Duplex could make the AI ​​magician more realistic now.